ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs ATI FireGL V3600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Lower TDP (20W vs 73W)
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
More VRAM (256GB vs 128GB)
120 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Jun 2007
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
120
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
20W
TDP
73W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
RV630
-
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
Rage 9
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
2.0
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
4.0
