ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
4480 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Sep 2021
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
70
-
Shading Units
4480
4
TMUs
280
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
GA100
-
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
Rage 9
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
N/A
2.0
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
-
Shader Model
N/A
