ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs Intel Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 25W)
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Jan 2022
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
25W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Rage 9
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
6.6
