ATI FireMV 2250 vs ATI Radeon X1050 AGP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
More VRAM (256GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
ATI Radeon X1050 AGP 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Lower TDP (24W vs 32W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Nov 2007
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Radeon R300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
203 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
128MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
6.496GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Board Design
32W
TDP
24W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
RV360
-
-
-
R500
Architecture
Rage 9
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
130 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
0.06 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
76 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
9.0 (9_0)
2.1
OpenGL
2.0
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
-
