ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Aug 2016
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5X
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
480.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
28
-
Shading Units
3584
4
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
147.0 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
342.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
171.5 GFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
10.97 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
342.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
GP102
-
GPU Variant
GP102-400-A1
R500
Architecture
Pascal
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
3.0
Shader Model
6.4
