ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon RX 560D
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon RX 560D 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1175MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Jul 2017
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1090 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1175 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
896
4
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.80 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
65.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.106 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
2.106 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
131.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0b
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
Polaris 21
-
GPU Variant
Polaris 21 XL
R500
Architecture
GCN 4.0
UMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
80 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
3 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.4
