ATI FireMV 2250 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
More VRAM (256GB vs 128GB)
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (16.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
Lower TDP (20W vs 32W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Jan 2008
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
128MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Board Design
32W
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
RV380
-
-
-
R500
Architecture
Rage 9
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
130 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
9.0
2.1
OpenGL
2.0
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
-
