ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Jul 2015
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
56
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
3584
4
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
224.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.168 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
7.168 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
448.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
Fiji
-
GPU Variant
Fiji PRO CB
(215-0862046)
R500
Architecture
GCN 3.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.3
