ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
12800 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Aug 2023
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1155 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
100
-
Shading Units
12800
4
TMUs
400
4
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
400
-
RT Cores
100
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
448.8 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1020 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
65.28 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
65.28 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1020 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102
R500
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.7
