ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 290W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (608.3GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Unknown
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1575 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1188 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
608.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
48
-
Shading Units
6144
4
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
169.9 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
339.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.75 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
21.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
339.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
290W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
GA104
-
GPU Variant
GA104-401-A1
R500
Architecture
Ampere
UMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
3.0
Shader Model
6.6
