ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA NVS 810
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 2GB VRAM NVS 810 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 68W)
NVIDIA NVS 810 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1033MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Nov 2015
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
902 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
512
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.53 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.06 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
1058 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
33.06 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
68W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
8x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
R500
Architecture
Maxwell
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
3.0
Shader Model
5.1
