ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA L20
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 48GB VRAM L20 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 275W)
NVIDIA L20 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
11776 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Nov 2023
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Tesla Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
92
-
Shading Units
11776
4
TMUs
368
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
368
-
RT Cores
92
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
322.6 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
927.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
59.35 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
59.35 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
927.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102
R500
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.7
