ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD FireStream 9270
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 160W)
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Nov 2008
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
800
4
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
160W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
R500
Architecture
TeraScale
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
4.1
