ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)
NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (231.9GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Apr 2021
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
885 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
231.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
10
-
Shading Units
1280
4
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.24 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.339 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
4.339 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
135.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
R500
Architecture
Ampere
UMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
Unknown
100 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
3.0
Shader Model
6.6
