ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
More VRAM (640GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
112 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Nov 2007
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
640MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
-
Shading Units
112
4
TMUs
28
4
ROPs
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
80 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
32W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
G80
-
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
R500
Architecture
Tesla
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
3.0
Shader Model
4.0
