ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA NVS 315
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (19W vs 32W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Mar 2013
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
-
Shading Units
48
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
19W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
GF119
-
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
R500
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
3.0
Shader Model
5.1
