ATI FireMV 2250 vs ATI FirePro V5800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 74W)
ATI FirePro V5800 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Apr 2010
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
800
4
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.04 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
27.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
1104 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
32W
TDP
74W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
Juniper
-
GPU Variant
Juniper XT GL
R500
Architecture
TeraScale 2
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
1.04 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
166 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.0
