ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD FirePro D700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 6GB VRAM FirePro D700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro D700 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (263.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Jan 2014
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1370 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
263.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
2048
4
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
870.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
274W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
R500
Architecture
GCN 1.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.1
