ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD FirePro RG220A
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 35W)
AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
May 2010
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FirePro Remote
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
80
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
32W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
M93
-
-
-
R500
Architecture
TeraScale
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
4.1
