ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA A2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 16GB VRAM A2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 60W)
NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Nov 2021
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
200.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
10
-
Shading Units
1280
4
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.64 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.531 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
4.531 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
70.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
R500
Architecture
Ampere
UMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
Unknown
100 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
3.0
Shader Model
6.6
