Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8650 vs NVIDIA T600

ATI FireGL V8650 vs NVIDIA T600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 4GB VRAM T600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T600 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
T600 +288%
1.709 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Apr 2021
FireGL
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
735 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
320
Shading Units
640
16
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
53.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.418 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.709 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
53.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
40W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
TU117
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net