ATI FireGL V8650 vs NVIDIA T400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
64 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
T400
+148%
1.094 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
May 2021
FireGL
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
320
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
TU117
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
