Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8650 vs ATI FirePro V5800

ATI FireGL V8650 vs ATI FirePro V5800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
ATI FirePro V5800 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
480 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
FirePro V5800 +150%
1.104 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Apr 2010
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
800
16
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.04 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
27.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1104 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
74W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Juniper
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
Juniper XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
1.04 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
166 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net