ATI FireGL V8650 vs ATI FirePro V3700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
280 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
+587%
0.44 TFLOPS
FirePro V3700
0.064 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Aug 2008
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
15.20GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
40
16
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
32W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
RV620
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
RV620 GL
(215-0670004)
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
