ATI FireGL V5600 vs NVIDIA T600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 and 4GB VRAM T600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T600 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
520 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 89W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
T600
+790%
1.709 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Apr 2021
FireGL
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
735 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
120
Shading Units
640
8
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
6.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
53.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.418 TFLOPS
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.709 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
53.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
89W
TDP
40W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
TU117
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
