ATI FireGL V5600 vs NVIDIA NVS 300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (35.20GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
104 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (18W vs 89W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V5600
+392%
0.192 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Jan 2011
FireGL
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
120
Shading Units
16
8
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
6.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
89W
TDP
18W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
GT218
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
