ATI FireGL V5600 vs ATI FirePro V4900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
360 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 89W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900
+300%
0.768 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Nov 2011
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
480
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
6.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
89W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
Turks
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0
