ATI FireGL V5600 vs AMD Radeon R7 240
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (35.20GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
200 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 89W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240
+159%
0.499 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Oct 2013
FireGL
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
780 MHz
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
20
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
6.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
89W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
Oland
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Oland PRO
(215-0837015)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
