ATI FireGL V5600 vs AMD FirePro D300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (89W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
1160 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
FirePro D300
+1033%
2.176 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Jan 2014
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
6.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
89W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
Pitcairn
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
