ATI FireGL V5600 vs NVIDIA NVS 315
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (35.20GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
72 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Lower TDP (19W vs 89W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V5600
+92%
0.192 TFLOPS
NVS 315
0.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Mar 2013
FireGL
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
120
Shading Units
48
8
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
6.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
-
-
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
89W
TDP
19W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
GF119
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
