ATI FireGL V5600 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (35.20GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (32W vs 89W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V5600
+500%
0.192 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Jan 2009
FireGL
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
40
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
6.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
89W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
RV620
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
