ATI FireGL V5600 vs NVIDIA A2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 and 16GB VRAM A2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
1160 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 89W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
A2
+2259%
4.531 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Nov 2021
FireGL
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
200.1GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
120
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.64 GPixel/s
6.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.531 TFLOPS
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.531 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
70.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
89W
TDP
60W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
GA107
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
Unknown
153 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
