ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA T600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 4GB VRAM T600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T600 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
520 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 73W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
T600
+1086%
1.709 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Apr 2021
FireGL
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
735 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
120
Shading Units
640
8
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
53.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.418 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.709 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
53.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
40W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
TU117
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
