ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 100W)
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
5000 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+15900%
23.04 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Mar 2023
FireGL
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
40
120
Shading Units
5120
8
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
AD104
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
