ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 6500 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 107W)
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2815MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (143.9GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
904 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6500 XT
+3903%
5.765 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Jan 2022
FireGL
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2310 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2815 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2248 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
143.9GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
90.08 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
180.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
11.53 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.765 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
360.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
107W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
Navi 24
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XT
(215-135000006)
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
