ATI FireGL V3600 vs ATI FirePro V4800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (69W vs 73W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
FirePro V4800
+330%
0.62 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Apr 2010
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
400
8
TMUs
20
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.50 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
620.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
73W
TDP
69W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
Redwood
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Redwood XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0
