ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD Radeon R7 250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
392 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 73W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250
+397%
0.717 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Oct 2013
FireGL
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
716.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
44.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
55W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
Cape Verde
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
