ATI FireGL V3600 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
More VRAM (256GB vs 128GB)
120 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Lower TDP (20W vs 73W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Jan 2008
FireGL
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
128MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
-
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-
Board Design
73W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
RV380
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
130 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
9.0
3.3
OpenGL
2.0
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
-
