ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA H200 NVL
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 141GB VRAM H200 NVL to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 600W)
NVIDIA H200 NVL 's Advantages
Released 17 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (141GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.89TB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
16776 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
H200 NVL
+41788%
60.32 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Nov 2024
FireGL
Generation
Server Hopper
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1365 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1593 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
141GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM3e
128bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
4.89TB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
132
120
Shading Units
16896
8
TMUs
528
4
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.84 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
942.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
241.3 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
60.32 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
30.16 TFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
600W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
GH100
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Hopper
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
80 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
814 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
