ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample 's Advantages
Boost Clock928MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2760 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
+3611%
5.345 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Unknown
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
875 MHz
-
Boost Clock
928 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
336.6GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
2880
8
TMUs
240
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.7 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.345 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
222.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
GK180
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
GK180-425-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.175
-
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
