ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2184 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+3877%
5.728 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Apr 2017
FireGL
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
2304
8
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
Ellesmere
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
