ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 204W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
120 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
+391%
0.708 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Jan 2009
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
120
Shading Units
240
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
204W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
GT200B
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
