ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA NVS 810
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 2GB VRAM NVS 810 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (16.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
NVIDIA NVS 810 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1033MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
392 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (68W vs 73W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
NVS 810
+634%
1.058 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Nov 2015
FireGL
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
902 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.53 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.06 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1058 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
33.06 GFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
68W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
8x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
GM107
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
