ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 219W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (127.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
120 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275
+368%
0.674 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Jan 2009
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
120
Shading Units
240
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
673.9 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
84.24 GFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
219W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
GT200B
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
G200-105-B3
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
