ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (16.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
24 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Lower TDP (49W vs 73W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 620
+86%
0.269 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
May 2012
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
120
Shading Units
96
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
49W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
GF108
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
GF108-100-KB-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
