Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 16GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (128GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 1.02TB/s)
12544 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (1746MHz vs 1600MHz)
Lower TDP (300W vs 2400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+290%
52.43 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
13.41 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Nov 2018
Data Center GPU
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
1746 MHz
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2
8192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
1.02TB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
60
-
SM Count
48
16384
Shading Units
3840
1024
TMUs
240
0
ROPs
64
1024
Tensor Cores
192
128
RT Cores
48
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
408 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.7 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
419.0 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
26.82 TFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.41 TFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.705 TFLOPS
Board Design
2400W
TDP
300W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
Vega 20
-
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GLXT
Generation 12.5
Architecture
GCN 5.1
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
7 nm
100 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
