Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs AMD Radeon PRO W7800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 32GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
More VRAM (128GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 576.0GB/s)
11904 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 58% (2525MHz vs 1600MHz)
Lower TDP (260W vs 2400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+15%
52.43 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7800
45.25 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Apr 2023
Data Center GPU
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi(Navi III Series)
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1895 MHz
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
2525 MHz
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
32GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
70
-
-
-
16384
Shading Units
4480
1024
TMUs
280
0
ROPs
128
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
70
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
408 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
323.2 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.0 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
90.50 TFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.25 TFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1414 GFLOPS
Board Design
2400W
TDP
260W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1
1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
Navi 31
-
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Generation 12.5
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
5 nm
100 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
