Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
14848 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 2400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem +2190%
52.43 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Jun 2013
Data Center GPU
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
16384
Shading Units
1536
1024
TMUs
128
0
ROPs
32
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
408 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
100 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

2400W
TDP
225W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy