Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 96GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1350 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (96GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (2458GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
13312 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1620MHz vs 1550MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 450W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max 1350
+1239%
44.44 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Max Q
3.318 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
May 2019
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
750 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz
Memory
96GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
2458GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
14336
Shading Units
1024
896
TMUs
64
0
ROPs
32
896
Tensor Cores
-
112
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
408 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
1389 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
44.44 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
44.44 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
44.44 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
450W
TDP
40W
850 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Turing
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
100 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
