Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 96GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1350 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (96GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (2458GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
14304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 450W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max 1350
+55450%
44.44 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Jun 2007
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
750 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
96GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
2458GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
14336
Shading Units
32
896
TMUs
16
0
ROPs
8
896
Tensor Cores
-
112
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
-
408 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
1389 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
44.44 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
44.44 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
44.44 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
450W
TDP
50W
850 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
80 nm
100 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
